How earthquake preparation has changed since 1906

By Rob Nesbit : kron4 – excerpt

SAN FRANCISCO (KRON) — Thursday marked the anniversary of the 1906 earthquake and fire that devastated San Francisco, killing 3,000 people. It’s been more than a century since then and a lot of lessons have been learned when it comes to being prepared for a quake.

Before 1906, building codes were lax because of profits. For instance, wood was used more to save money. That doesn’t happen today, but there’s still concerns for safety.

Building codes have been updated, but when Dave Osgood from the Coalition For San Francisco Neighborhoods researched data on 180 of the city’s tallest buildings he found concerns.

“There are 43 tall buildings with the same kind of foundation that the Millennium Tower had before it started leaning and had to be propped up,” Osgood said.

The number one priority in cases like this is safety.

Emily Guglielmo, president of the Structural Engineers Assoc. of California, says that modern buildings codes do a good job of saving lives in the event of an earthquake. But she also said there’s room for improvement when it comes to making sure buildings are usable after shaking.

…. (more)

Last time we worked on seismic upgrades for our building, we were told that the upgrade that brought us up to code for a public space, is only guaranteed to save lives. Not guaranteed to be safe after a big earthquake.

SF could get federal funding for 4,000 affordable housing units—maybe

By Savannah Dewberry : 48hills – excerpt

So far, the Breed Administration has not taken advantage of a program that will close in September.

In 2023, San Francisco announced its goal of having 82,000 new homes built by 2031 in order to address affordability and overcrowding concerns. This would require the city to build 28 new units every day for the entire eight year span of the project.

The city’s goals include 46,000 units of affordable housing. But only 871 were built in 2023.

A new funding program developed by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) could alleviate this issue—if the city takes advantage of it. Called Faircloth-to-RAD, the program debuted in 2021 with the first new affordable units being built in Galveston, Texas

RAD is short for Rental Assistance Demonstration, a HUD program that launched during the Obama administration. It would allow public housing authorities to convert subsidized public housing units to Section 8 subsidies, and potentially attract private investors to help cover repairs. …

Supervisor Dean Preston’s chief of staff, Preston Kilgore, said in an interview that their office asked asked the Breed Administration to look into the RAD program back in 2022. However, it wasn’t until this month, when the Board of Supervisors unanimously passed a resolution calling on SFHA to release a call for interested developers, did SFHA and the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Developmen confirm that they plan to do a feasibility analysis of the program this year… (more)

Senate Environmental Quality Committee Passes Senator Wiener’s Bill To Revitalize Downtown San Francisco

From Scott Wiener via email

SACRAMENTO – The Senate Environmental Quality Committee passed Senator Scott Wiener’s (D-San Francisco) Senate Bill 1227, new legislation that spurs the revitalization of downtown San Francisco by providing regulatory and tax relief to a targeted area for a period of 7 years. The bill passed 4-2 and heads next to the Senate Revenue & Taxation Committee…

The bill provides an expedited pathway to convert parts of downtown San Francisco’s office-heavy downtown to a vibrant mixed-use hub of activity…

SB 1227 does not relax any local permitting or zoning requirements. The City of San Francisco will continue to implement its local permitting requirements. The City will also be able to invoke this CEQA exemption.

Second, SB 1227 expands the ‘welfare exemption’ from property tax for specified projects that provide rental housing up to 120% of the area median income, so long as projects are rented 10% below the market value, as determined by the Housing and Urban Development Fair Market Rents. This provision expands a property tax exemption used by affordable housing projects to encourage the production of moderate-income workforce housing projects in downtown San Francisco. This expansion will help the City meet its housing goals while giving more moderate-income workers a chance to locate close to jobs and supporting local businesses with an increase in area residents.

The downtown zone covered by the bill includes the Financial District, Union Square, Civic Center, Yerba Buena, East Cut, Eastern and Central SOMA, South Beach, and Rincon Hill.

SB 1227 is sponsored by San Francisco Mayor London Breed. The bill is supported by the San Francisco Housing Accelerator Fund, the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, YIMBY Action, SPUR, Bay Area Council, and many others… (more)

Democrats kill California homeless camp ban, again

By Marisa Kendall : calmatters – excerpt

For the second year in a row, Democrats today voted down a bill that sought to ban homeless encampments near schools, transit stops and other areas throughout California.

Despite the fact that cities up and down the state are grappling with a proliferation of homeless camps, legislators said they oppose penalizing down-and-out residents who sleep on public property.

Senate Bill 1011 stumbled in its first committee hearing, stalling in the Public Safety Committee on a 1-3 vote. The measure by Senate GOP leader Brian Jones and Democratic Sen. Catherine Blakespear, both of the San Diego area, would have made camping within 500 feet of a school, open space or major transit stop a misdemeanor or infraction. It also would have banned camping on public sidewalks if beds were available in local homeless shelters…

Sen. Nancy Skinner, a Democrat from Oakland, said while she appreciates that Californians don’t want to see encampments, she couldn’t support the bill.

“It’s kind of like trying to make a problem invisible versus addressing the core of the problem,” said Skinner, who joined Wahab and Sen. Scott Wiener, a Democrat from San Francisco, in voting “no.”…(more)

RELATED:

California fails to track its homelessness spending or results, a new audit says

This is a controversial issue, but, one that could hurt some of those who voted to opposite. I’m wondering what Scott Wiener thinks is the core of the problem and how he would address it. Does he think that building more housing is the solution or has he some other idea he has not shared with us?

Can Breed and Farrell Unite to Stop Peskin?

By Randy Shaw : beyondchron – excerpt

“Anybody telling you to vote for a single mayoral candidate just wants Aaron Peskin to win.”— @sbuss, April 1

Aaron Peskin’s entry into the San Francisco mayor’s race has led to a lot of talk about moderates uniting to stop him. This won’t be easy.

Here’s why.

Breed and Farrell Fundamentally Disagree

Mark Farrell’s mayoral campaign is premised on his view that incumbent Mayor Breed has failed. From his website:

“Over the past five years, I have watched our City crumble. People don’t feel safe, the conditions of our streets have never been worse, downtown has collapsed, and we’re the butt of jokes across America. We have a crisis of confidence in City government that needs to be fixed, and it starts and stops with the Mayor.”

Can Farrell retain credibility if he starts telling voters, “Make the candidate who has caused our city to crumble your second choice.”?

I don’t see it…(more)

Why would Mark want to support Breed? In my opinion he is not that desperate to win. He wants to return San Francisco to a city he wants to live in. He thinks he can do it or he would not run. Peskin gave him the job the last time. They are probably not that far apart. We think the goals are similar. Methodology may be what is different. Financing schemes may differ as well.

Move over, YIMBYs. It’s time for us to be SHIMBYs to get housing done in SF.

Opinion By Joe Jamil : sfstandard – excerpt

We need a return to pragmatic, bottom-up neighborhood and community planning that respects existing height limits and fosters community consensus for new development, says Mo Jamil

YIMBYs are demonizing San Francisco residents and small businesses with labels like NIMBY. But such smears can’t obscure the truth about the extreme housing policies of Mayor London Breed, state Sen. Scott Wiener and their allies.

Simply put, an “upzoning” plan to double height limits and disregard public input is radical and will not benefit the city’s residents or small businesses. Rather, such moves would destroy our neighborhoods and displace the people and local businesses that make San Francisco special.

Last week, the mayor appeared to shelve the most radical elements of the upzoning plan in favor of a more targeted and nuanced approach that I and other neighbors and merchants have advocated. Despite the mayor’s clear about-face, the radical fringe YIMBY elements rushed to social media to call for an even bigger plan that demolishes existing buildings and expands the scope of the rezoning plan. Did they get the memo from Room 200 or do a temperature check of residents and merchants? Clearly not…

I identify with the many residents and merchants who are best described as SHIMBYs: Sensible Housing in My Backyard advocates. We reject polarization and name-calling. We demand pragmatism and dialogue so we can be both pro-neighborhood and pro-housing.…(more)

Moe Jamil is a deputy city attorney, Russian Hill Neighbors board member and a candidate for District 3 supervisor in November’s election. His comments are his own and do not represent the views of his employer.

Could SF get anticorruption ‘inspector general’? Peskin hopes good-government proposal doubles as good politics.

By Joe Eskenazi : 48hills – excerpt

Ballot measures for mayoral candidates serve as as publicity engines, storyline generators and soft-money conduits
Board President Aaron Peskin on April 6 officially announced his mayoral run. He mentioned a potential future ballot measure regarding the establishment of an ‘inspector general’ to confront San Francisco’s rampant corruption issues.

This was what was ostensibly in the back of Board President Aaron Peskin’s mind when he shocked, shocked gatherers at his April 6 mayoral launch with the announcement that he’d establish “a new tool for fighting corruption and cleaning up City Hall – an Inspector General, under the Controller, with the power of subpoena and investigation.”

An inspector general? That’s a very dramatic title; surely others also envisioned Russell Crowe glowering in an ill-fitting period costume. But that’s not what Peskin is envisioning. Rather, his proposal is, literally, cribbed from “best practices” reports for “promotion of the public trust.”

That would make it neither creative nor theatrical. And, if Peskin can persuade five of his Board colleagues to get to yes, we’ll all be voting on this come November…(more)

CSFN Meeting and Newsletter

CSFN April Newsletter: April 2024 News
Linked on the front page: csfn.net

April-2024-NL
PDF Document · 3.8 MB

Download flyers re: Coastal Commission and Traffic Bills.

Lots of actions coming up this month.
Send any photos you have with the candidates for the May Newsletter (zrants)

This meeting is about SFMTA and our transportation problems.
Thanks for those of you who sent in questions and suggestions.
There is still time to add your issues to the list.
Or suggestions if you have any.

Register for the meetings. Invite anyone who is concerned about transportation.

Tuesday, April 16, 6:30 PMZoom
CSFN General Assembly Meeting Program: Transportion
Bob Feinbaum on Muni Trains (with Reso)
Up-zoning brings parking nightmares for residents.
Ask the candidates what they will do to protect us.
https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZYvf-6grT0tGtWqftDIQgyIUjo6rMfrelZf

Thursday, April 11, 2024, 6:30-8:30 PM – a live event Zoom
Christ Church Lutheran, 1090 Quintara Street
Sunset/Parkside District 4 Town Hall – Up-zoning Plans
Protect Neighborhoods, Support Merchants, Meet Housing Needs
Register – in person* Limited space of 125
Register – via Zoom

Download flyers re: Coastal Commission and Traffic Bills.

Four Anti-California Coastal Commission Bills Hit Sacramento.

These four bills — all by Democrats — take different tacks:
Actions may take if you oppose them

•   SB951 By San  Francisco Senator Scott Wiener
Puts further restrictions on what kinds of projects can be appealed directly to the Commission. In it’s current version. https://digitaldemocracy.calmatters.org/bills/ca_202320240sb951?slug=CA_202320240SB951
An earlier version of that bill would have cut a chunk of San Francisco out of the Coastal Zone entire, but that proposal was amended. https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/coast-housing-wiener-18624806.php Together they show that many pro-housing legislators have taken heart from last year’s battle for the coast.

•   AB2560 by San Diego Assemblymember David Alvarez.
Exempts from the Coastal Act apartment projects that make use of density bonus law – a policy that lets developers build taller, higher and with fewer restrictions if they set aside units for lower income residents. https://digitaldemocracy.calmatters.org/bills/ca_202320240ab2560?slug=CA_202320240AB2560

•   SB1077 Encinitas Senator Catherine Blakespear
Makes the same exception for accessory dwelling units ( ADUs) https://digitaldemocracy.calmatters.org/bills/ca_202320240sb1077?slug=CA_202320240SB1077,

•   SB1092 by Encinitas Senator Catherine Blakespear
Forces the Commission to process appeals of locally-approved apartment buildings faster.  https://digitaldemocracy.calmatters.org/bills/ca_202320240sb1092?slug=CA_202320240SB1092

RELATED:
Fresh batch of YIMBY housing bills clash with coastal protections (again)

Have SF voters truly weakened city‘s ‘strong mayor’ government?

By Patrick Hope : sfexaminer – excerpt (includes audio track)

Some people say the post of mayor of San Francisco is one of the strongest of its kind in the nation; others insist it has been so hobbled by voter-approved restrictions that nobody could do the job effectively.

The question, central to the current mayor’s race, reflects the historic tug-of-war in San Francisco over how much authority should rest with The City’s elected chief executive versus other arms of city government — notably the Board of Supervisors — especially since 1996, when voters most recently approved a City Charter.

That was the year that the legendary Willie Brown began the first of his two controversial terms as mayor, a tenure that many cite today as an example of what a powerful and effective executive can be — but which rankled others who perceived a culture of corruption…(more)