The Housing Accelerator Fund is committed to the preservation and expansion of quality affordable housing for economically disadvantaged individuals and families throughout the greater San Francisco Bay Area. An innovative nonprofit public-private partnership and certified Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI), HAF works with community-based organizations, local governments, and private and philanthropic institutions to provide powerful new financing tools that accelerate housing solutions for the Bay Area’s most vulnerable residents. This includes the newly launched Industrialized Construction Catalyst Fund as well as the Bay Area Housing Innovation Fund and other tailored financing products. Visit us at www.sfhaf.org...(more)
Skeletons in the closet: Inside the unraveling of the California Academy of Sciences
By Sam Mondros : sfstandard – excerpt (via email)

But employees say Sampson never lived there full time — and he has admitted as much in staff meetings and to colleagues. Cars owned by Sampson and his wife are registered to an ocean-view home in Muir Beach. Employees report that Sampson used the home as a pied-à-terre, only spending a portion of his time there. Despite this, the academy has allegedly taken staffers away from their primary responsibilities at the museum to work on maintaining the house, as well as spending tens of thousands of dollars on upgrades that include electric car chargers, new furniture, fresh paint, and manicured landscaping.
Even before Sampson took over as director, the house was a symbol of questionable management by the leadership of Northern California’s largest museum, which is overseen by a sprawling board of 45 well-heeled individuals and scientists whose decisions over the past two decades, critics say, have plunged the institution into chaos.
After a controversial exit in 2019 by the previous director, Jonathan Foley — marked by a divorce settlement that gave his ex-wife the right to continue living in the academy-owned home in Pacific Heights — Sampson was hired by the board of directors to develop a new global vision for the museum. This included a three-pronged initiative to boost research and conservation of island ecosystems, global reefs, and native habitats in California
Some of that vision came to pass during Sampson’s time in charge, which saw the launch of several major initiatives, including Reimagining San Francisco, a coalition of more than 60 organizations collaborating to improve green spaces, and One Galápagos, aimed at restoring ecological health throughout the Galápagos Islands.
But employees say many of his most far-reaching goals were never realized, as pandemic-related revenue losses hobbled the museum’s growth plans. In spite of these declining fortunes, the board awarded eye-popping bonuses and salaries to Sampson and the rest of the museum’s executive staff over the last several years.
“When I saw in the Chronicle the quote(opens in new tab) about blaming the pandemic for the financial woes, I just about lost my lunch,” said one former employee who served in a leadership role. “To still be blaming the pandemic for revenue loss at the academy just seems bonkers.”
Founded in 1853, the California Academy of Sciences has spent the better part of two centuries accumulating things: 40 million specimens, 40,000 live animals, a planetarium, an indoor rainforest, an aquarium, and a reputation as one of the country’s great scientific institutions. Its $488 million home in Golden Gate Park, a sinuous, 410,000-square-foot building that seems to have grown organically from the earth beneath it, is the kind of place that makes children press their faces against the glass and adults briefly forget their phones.
But among those millions of carefully cataloged creatures, the academy has buried more than a few metaphorical skeletons, according to interviews with 16 current and former employees, including executives, department directors, and staff in facilities, payroll, programming, exhibitions, and science departments — all of whom were granted anonymity in order to speak freely about their experiences.
Staffers and representatives of SEIU 1021, the union that represents approximately 350 museum workers, have raised concerns over what they call unnecessary spending at the academy, pointing to rising salaries on the executive team; costs associated with the house on Jackson Street; first-class airfare for the executive director; the hiring of Sampson associates for projects that went over-budget; and a board of directors that has mismanaged the museum’s debt.
All of this comes against the backdrop of falling revenue, slashed programs, lost jobs, and a prolonged budget deficit that threatens to bury alive one of San Francisco’s most beloved institutions…. (more)
S.F. eyes $125M annually for affordable housing, more than double current funding
By JOE RIVANO BARROS : missionlocal – excerpt
Melgar, Lurie also announce immediate $70 million injection to preserve housing

Supervisor Myrna Melgar plans to introduce legislation Tuesday that would more than double San Francisco’s annual budget for affordable housing to some $125 million, part of a bargain she hammered out with Mayor Daniel Lurie.
Melgar said her proposal would vastly expand the city’s capacity to build affordable housing by allocating $125 million annually into the city’s Housing Trust Fund, up from the $52 million that goes into it today, while also extending the fund for another 30 years. That would be a total of at least $3.75 billion.
The increase would be funded by “allocating a portion of future property tax growth every year” to the fund, according to a press release sent by Melgar and Lurie.
“I cut a deal with the mayor,” Melgar said, to use property taxes “coming from the increase in the value of all properties in San Francisco” as a result of last year’s upzoning.
The proposal would take the increase in future property taxes and “put it aside” into the low-income housing fund, Melgar said.
“Housing is not getting built at the pace we need, and the consequences are all around us,” Mayor Lurie said in a statement. “Today, we’re jumpstarting affordable housing in San Francisco.”… (more)
It is good to hear someone mentioning the need to preserve the existing affordable housing as an immediate plan. Given the economic reality that we are living in, it is naive to expect new housing will be built any time soon. That is no one’s fault, unless you want to blame the national condition we are living in, but, placing the blame does not solve the problem. Giving into reality and what is possible now does.
California’s second-largest home insurer to raise rates this fall

Please Help the landowner of the four undeveloped lots at 1230 – 1240 Twin Peaks Blvd. donate his property

The lot owner would like to donate the property to either the city, the RPD and/or a nature conservatory. He does not want to sell the property and have it developed for housing units. He has asked the surrounding neighborhood, Midtown Terrace Home Owners Association (MTHOA) to take the lead in helping him donate his property. To sign the “Donate the Land” petition contact: Midtownterrace.org
If the property were to be donated, it would remain in its natural state and probably be planted with California native plants. The landowner would also donate $50,000 towards property maintenance.
This property is at the gateway of the Panorama Drive side of Twin Peaks Blvd. If the donated lots were kept in a natural state, they would greatly compliment the entrance of the new Promenade that is being built on the top of Twin Peaks.
Twin Peaks is the second-highest natural point in San Francisco (922+ feet), surpassed only by Mount Davidson. Unofficially the number two (2) tourist destination by volume, Twin Peaks is a premier, world-famous attraction renowned for offering the best 360-degree, panoramic views of the City and Bay.
TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE:If the landowner cannot donate his property, it will be sold to a developer. This will lead to prolonged construction, an unattractive building, public safety issues, parking problems, traffic congestion, noise, quality of life concerns for surrounding residents and increases in crime. Please Contact: MidtownTerrace.org and Myrna Melgar 415-554-6516 or MelgarStaff@sfgov.org
California’s blockbuster legislation faces rocky rollout
By Sam Dillon : msn – excerpt

Commentary: How long can you hold a citizenry hostage to a crisis?
Mass confusion over the meaning and implementation of SB79, which amounts to unlimited growth near mass transit, is sweeping California’s largest cities that are targeted by the one of the most draconian bills ever devised. After turning over the Pacific coastline to developers, and blaming cities for the housing shortage, Senator Wiener, has managed to make almost everyone mad at him. Now it turns out his penchant for writing long, detailed, prescriptive bills is not playing well with the public or city officials who are charged with enforcing what has been described as developer wet dreams.
Give the anger and confusion over SB79 in his district is giving Scott Wiener’s competitors a boost. He is rumored to be considering a delay in implementation of the bill as he seeks support for his new power move to Washington to replace Pelosi.
In his haste to divide and conquer Wiener has succeeded in dividing both his friends and foes, often referred to as YIMBYS and NIMBYS. Wiener is not enjoying a lot of support from the press either. He relies heavily on the Abundant crowd in Silicon Valley, that his constituents are being hammered by. If you were not recently laid off by a high tech firm, you may have lost your income to Waymo or been evicted from a gentrified neighborhood.
Wiener is fighting a Dead horse that is obvious to everyone but him and people are ready to fight back.
There are some gems in this article that covers a lot of the history of how we got here and where the Wiener of the world want us to go. Here are a couple of pull-quotes from the article:


San Francisco’s pharmacy crisis deepens with another store closure
By Madeline Medina : sfgate – excerpt (audio)
CVS Pharmacy plans to close another one of its San Francisco locations next month.
CVS Pharmacy plans to shutter one of its San Francisco locations next month, further shrinking its presence in a city already grappling with widespread pharmacy closures.
The store at 701 Van Ness Ave. is slated to close on Feb. 24, the company said in a statement shared with SFGATE, leaving just eight CVS stores in San Francisco.
Patient prescriptions will be transferred to the pharmacy located at 1059 Hyde St., which is about 1 mile away from the Van Ness location. Employees at the closing location are also being offered “comparable roles within the company,” CVS said in its statement.
CVS did not cite an exact reason for the closure, but the company said some of the factors it considers are “market dynamics, population shifts and a community’s store density.”
For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong
By Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?… (more)
When all is said and done a lot of what should not be built is not, often because the market doesn’t support it. The threats are real, but the reality does not back up the claims. The is the real reason these behemoths are on hold. How many large projects can you name that are sitting on the entitlement shelf?
At Richmond upzoning town hall, crowd is tough and Mayor Lurie is feisty
By Juneau Yang : missionlocal – excerpt
Richmond residents want mayor’s upzoning plan to change. Lurie says time for change is over.
Is Lurie succumbing to Wiener’s Whip:
It was Mayor Daniel Lurie’s first town hall to discuss his plan to upzone the low-slung Richmond District, among several other neighborhoods, mostly in the west and north of the city.
As the night wore on, the crowd was tough, and the normally even-keeled mayor grew increasingly feisty.
Residents asked repeatedly how he would protect the district’s rent-controlled housing from being demolished and replaced with new, market-rate units, and keep tenants from being displaced…
Why couldn’t the mayor’s zoning plan be changed to provide more protections for the local businesses and residents of the Richmond? Surely, there must be alternatives?
Lurie’s response was, essentially, that protections against these kinds of demolitions doexist: The city has some of the strongest rent-control protections in the state, he said, and that will continue under the new plan.
Due to these protections, for the past decade when the city’s eastern neighborhoods have already been upzoned, demolition of rent controlled units was “extremely rare.” On average, only seven units of multifamily housing were demolished every year, added Rachael Tanner, director of citywide planning…
Any more compromises, Lurie added, and the state could impose the “builder’s remedy,” and completely remove San Francisco’s ability to approve or reject future housing projects within city boundaries… (more)
If we hear this excuse one more time… There is a good possibility that the state laws recently enacted for a small percentage of cities, will not be on the books for long. SB 79 only won by 1 vote in both houses after the bill was exempted from a lot of the communities that voted to oppose it. As we know quite well, no law is written in stone. Our next round of state representatives and our next governor may vote to reverse a lot of the damage our the current lineup of state reps has done.
What is All the fuss about SB 79
Reading materials on SB 79: You don’t have to read them all, just look at the headlines and the number of articles being published about the growing opposition to Wiener and SB 79 from all over the state of California. Find out why the bill barely passed, after exempting most of the state from the bill.
Our Senator Wiener had to stick it to us! And the rest of the state knows he will come after them soon enough.
Key opponents include cities like Palo Alto, Cupertino, and Los Angeles, along with organizations like Cal Cities (League of California Cities).
Despite changes, critics remain unswayed by housing bill SB 79
Opinion: Don’t blame CEQA for California’s housing problems.
SB79: For preservation in Los Angeles, there is no greater threat
California affordable housing programs are on the chopping block after Supreme Court ruling

