The real lesson of L’affaire John Arntz: Competence doesn’t matter in SF

By Joe Eskenazi : missionlocal – excerpt

Every so often, San Francisco hands a flawless script to the nation’s right-wing blowhards and fulminating keyboard warriors, pins a “kick me” sign to its posterior and assumes the position. We can’t help it.

And you know what? It does a damn fine job of that. We can’t help it…

The latest flawless San Francisco script came neatly delivered on Nov. 21, when news broke that the city’s Election Commission had declined to preemptively re-up long-serving elections director John Arntz and instead moved to open up a competitive process for the job that he was invited to participate in….

Commissioner Cynthia Dai also told Mission Local that this decision was not performance-based, and conceded that San Francisco has run free and fair elections (and lots of them) for 20 years. Rather, she said it was time to open up the election director position to a more diverse field; San Francisco, she continued, could not make progress on its diversity goals without opening up top positions.

And Commissioner Robin Stone praised Arntz to the heavens in a memo she wrote him, but confirmed that her decision to not preemptively renew his term and open up a competitive process for his job “reflects a continued commitment to advance institutional DEIBJ” — that is, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Belonging and Justice.(more)

Seriously, what do you expect from the Elections Commission that just re-aligned the city districts to shift the power in such an obvious manner that no one is going to forget it anytime soon. If you took part in the farce you will never forget the way those commissioners that are now throwing out a seasoned professional our for a novice behaved.

No one seriously believes that the country or the world looks kindly at the San Francisco we now live in. If we started to perform on some level of competence someone would throw a wrench into the works to wreck it while the powers that be stand idly by, engrossed in choosing the next color for Muni bus stops, or the next statue to remove or the next street to rename. All more important than running a functioning city.

Three sites could add 1,000 affordable homes in the Mission…eventually

by Annika Hom : missionlocal – excerpt

Between three sites, hundreds of affordable housing comes to the Mission

Welcome to Mission Moves! This originally reported roundup reports on newsy Mission moves and happenings. Send tips and curious questions to annika.hom.

Hi friends,

I’ve been out sick, but lately there’s been a lot to talk about! Like, literally… a parking lot. And the 16th St. Mission BART Station site. And the Muni bus yard. Together, these proposed plans could account to over 1,100 units of housing, and much for seniors and families. But I know — you were hooked at “parking lot,” right? Who wouldn’t be? So, let’s get this show on the road!…

More waiting for the Marvel in the Mission…And what about that Muni Yard development?…From Sears to seniors(more)

These are some of the affordable housing projects planned for the Mission, but we don’t know how many of them may be counted toward the State’s RHANA goals. The Board of supervisors and Planning Department are being pressured into up-zoning by the state.

For more details on this subject and to better understand how your state representatives are representing/mis-representing your interests, you may want to review of of the details of the Housing Element here: https://www.discoveryink.net/?page_id=949

Notes on the supervisors’ comments : Supes on Housing Element

Mar concedes, as Board of Supes shifts in a conservative direction

By Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt

Gerrymandering and fear-mongering on crime gives the mayor two allies.

Sup. Gordon Mar conceded defeat today, ending the last unresolved race from the November 8 election and signaling a shift in the balance of power on the Board of Supes.

Thanks to Assemblymember Matt Haney’s personal ambition and Mayor London Breed’s successful gerrymandering, two progressive districts, 4 and 6, are now in the hands of far-more conservative supes.

That means the progressives now have at best a shaky 6-5 of 7-4 majority, not enough to overturn a mayoral veto…

Engardio also supports market solutions to the housing crisis, and will join Sups. Matt Dorsey and Catherine Stefani (and, generally, Ashsa Safai) as advocates for allowing more market-rate housing development.…(more)

City Flags FBI After Finding ‘Criminal Activity’ at Homelessness Nonprofit

Written by Annie Gaus, David Sjostedt : sfstandard – excerpt

An audit found a pattern of serious problems at a government-funded nonprofit that provides housing and other homelessness services, and the city’s budget office has referred the audit to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the District Attorney’s office as a criminal matter.

The audit by the San Francisco Controller’s Office found a pattern of mismanagement at United Council of Human Services (UCHS), a nonprofit providing homelessness services which has received $28 million in grants through a fiscal sponsor, Bayview Hunters Point Foundation…

It isn’t the first time the city’s budget office has found problems at UCHS.

A 2017 audit found a slew of organizational problems ranging from inexperienced board members serving longer terms than allowed, $88,140 in missing funds and a missing record of most employees who had ever worked at the company. The report presented 30 recommendations to establish more oversight at the nonprofit…(more)

Two crucial issues, housing and downtown, will come before the supes this week

by Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt

The new line from the neoliberals, Big Tech, and the mayor’s allies, and we saw it all through the campaign, was “a city that works.” Now Heather Knight at the Chron has picked it up:

No, San Franciscans haven’t turned into a bunch of right-wing Donald Trump lovers as some far-left city leaders and their acolytes repeat ad nauseam on Twitter. They just want a city that works — and they’re willing to put their money behind commonsense, good-government efforts in a bid to make that a reality…

San Francisco is required to adopt a new Housing Element to the General Plan, and the state wants it to include provisions to build 84,000 new housing units over the next eight years, and 46,000 of them need to be below-market rate.

That’s impossible, unless the state and federal government dramatically increase their spending: The price tag for the affordable housing is $19 billion.

And right now, hardly any developers want to build any sort of housing in San Francisco; the costs are too high and the returns are too low to generate the kind of profits that investors demand…

And yet, the fantasy world of the Housing Element continues.

On Tuesday/15, the Board of Supes, sitting as a Committee of the Whole, will hear a presentation on the document. Two days later, the Planning Commission is slated to approve the Final Environmental Impact Report and give its nod to the new Housing Element…

Comments From lawyer Sue Hestor, who has been consistently right (and never wrong) on planning issues for 50 years:

The EIR omits an issue, which we have been underproducing housing for low-income people, for working-class people, and instead the entire incentive is to apply, approve, and build luxury housing, and that housing can’t accommodate real workers. People working in San Francisco hotels and the retail district need housing. If they are not housed in San Francisco, at rents they can afford or housing prices they can afford to buy, they will sprawl throughout the region, and that affects transportation, noise, air pollution, and all the things that we are trying to step down. Instead, we are going to worsen them
If you want to read all of the comments and responses to the EIR, the document is here. The city planners simply say that since the Housing Element includes a lot of language about equity and racial justice, those things are going to happen…(more)

AND

The other huge, defining planning and economic issue for the city will be the focus of a set of hearing at the Budget and Finance Committee Wednesday/16: What is the city going to do about downtown?…

For more than half a century, mayors and supervisors have viewed downtown offices as the economic hope of the city. San Francisco’s entire transit system is designed to get workers from the neighborhoods to downtown. City leaders have courted not just developers but finance, insurance, and real-estate industries, then tech, to fill those towers…

Modest ideas and plans to help building owners aren’t going to work. So let me make a wild suggestion that might: Maybe downtown should be the new arts district of the world.

Anybody have a better idea?…(more)

Yeah. How about turning those towers into housing and leave the west side of the city alone. Bring back live-work zoning. Let people build their homes in the empty offices. That is what the artists did in the empty warehouses and industrial zones on the 1970’s.

LIVE: Nov. 8 election results

By Joe Eskenazi : missionlocal – excerpt

…scroll down to Races: click on Turnout

We got the same results as the last election. Very light voting in Districts 9, 10 and 11.

Heaviest voting was in the Haight and other interior areas district 5 and 8. We must do better. Maybe the passage of Prop H will help get people to the polls…(more)

SF educators fill Franklin Street to protest payroll debacle (ONGOING UPDATES)

by David Mamaril Horowitz : 48hills – excerpt

This story is being updated through Wednesday evening.

Traffic was halted on Franklin Street as well over 200 educators across some 20 school sites filled the street in front of the school district headquarters at 3 p.m. to protest the Empower pay crisis. Chants quickly overpowered the music.

“What do we want?” shouted Evelyn Sanchez, a teacher at San Francisco Community School and a protest organizer.

“Paychecks!” responded the crowd.

“When do we want them?”

“Now!”

More than 3,000 educators have been impacted across the San Francisco School District by the EMPowerSF payroll debacle, according to Alvarez & Marsal, the firm recently hired to assess and fix the EmPowerSF payroll system.

At the corner of 555 Franklin St., teachers took turns at the mic to share their stories…(more)

Nonprofit with $20 million in city money defies supes, won’t talk about labor issues

By Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt

Board members furious that the Felton Institute refused to answer questions at a hearing on union-contract issues.

A social-service nonprofit that gets more than $20 million a year in public money from San Francisco is engaged in a union struggle—and has refused to discuss the situation with the Board of Supervisors.

SEIU Local 1021 is trying to organize workers at The Felton Institute, which provides a wide range of social and behavioral health services, and union members say they are facing resistance.

But when the supes Government Audit and Oversight Committee held a hearing on the issue last week, nobody from Felton was willing to answer questions…

“They do good work,” Melgar told me. “But they have to be fair to their workers. And the best way to make sure that happens is for all the workers to have a union.”…(more)

How can they be doing good work when they are ripping off their employees?

Guest commentary: Why You Should Vote Yes on I and No on J

By Tomasita Medál and Nicky Tresviña : eltecolote – excerpt

San Francisco needs to be more accessible as a city, not less so, write guest commentators on Propositions for the upcoming election.

There are two items on this November’s ballot that greatly impact our community’s ability to have equal access to all of the amenities along JFK Drive in Golden Gate Park as well as easy access to Ocean Beach and the VA Hospital coming from the Mission, Excelsior, and Bayview on the Upper Great Highway.

Proposition I would restore car access to JFK Drive and Upper Great Highway to pre-Covid days, keeping JFK Drive accessible to everyone 24/7, except Sundays and holidays and some Saturdays in Spring and Summer. This returns JFK Drive to the SHARED space initiated in 1967.

Proposition J would close JFK Drive in Golden Gate Park 24/7 EVERY day of the year, permanently. It reserves JFK Drive only for the exclusive use of bicyclists! The road was designed to bring everyone to the Rose Garden, the Conservatory of Flowers, the Dahlia Garden, the Rhododendron Dell, the waterfall, the Academy of Sciences, and the deYoung Museum. Since Mayor Breed cited the pandemic as a reason to close JFK Drive 24/7, countless families from distant neighborhoods, with elders, disabled members, and young children have been excluded from all of the amenities along JFK Drive. These include winter night sights such as the Conservatory of Flowers light show and the “Enchanted Garden” neon forest installation…

We are saddened to see how our city has become so uncaring about the impact of these road closures on our vulnerable communities.

It’s easy for the able-bodied to dismiss the needs of those with disabilities, but we will all become elders eventually. Please have compassion for those more vulnerable than you. For these reasons, we urge you to register to vote and vote Yes on I and NO on J. This vote will impact generations to come.… (more)

Top SF Public Health Official Drew Second Six-Figure Salary From Drug Nonprofit As Its Finances Unraveled

By David Sjostedt : sfstandard – excerpt

A top Department of Public Health employee is making six figures moonlighting for a city-contracted drug rehab nonprofit that’s currently embroiled in a financial scandal and may be forced to shut down some of its programs.

At her day job, Lisa Pratt works as the city’s director of Jail Health Services overseeing medical care for inmates. But on the side, Pratt clocks 20 hours a week as the medical director of Baker Places, earning $123,000a year on top of her $428,750 city compensation. Baker Places receives the bulk of its funding from the health department, which also employs Pratt…

“Anytime there is even a hint of impropriety then that needs to be dealt with,” said Richard Greggory Johnson III, a University of San Francisco professor who specializes in nonprofit policy. “She might not have done anything outright wrong, but it’s certainly unethical.”… (more)