SF Parking Changes: A Reprieve From Sunday Charges, Later Meter Hours?

By Garrett Leahy : sfstandard – excerpt

The hours you get charged to park on San Francisco city streets were set to be changed this summer for the first time since 1947. But San Francisco supervisors passed a resolution last week urging the agency to delay the idea pending an “independent economic impact report.”

The San Francisco Municipal Transit Agency wants to extend meter hours from 6 to 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday and add Sunday metering hours in select parts of the city where parking charges previously did not exist.

The transit agency claims the plan will “expand parking availability and benefit all those who live, shop, worship and work in San Francisco.”

However, Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin said it seemed likely the agency would agree to postpone the changes until the city’s controller can do a study at some point in September. …(more)

Peskin plans to question Breed on public safety at UN Plaza

By Adam Shanks : sfexaminer – excerpt

People take cover on a rainy morning in the U.N. Plaza a day after the Tenderloin Center closed last December. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors will question Mayor London Breed at the plaza during its next meeting…

Mayor London Breed and the Board of Supervisors will discuss The City’s response to the opioid crisis at its epicenter.

Maybe.

In an unorthodox meeting organized by San Francisco Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin, Breed is set to field questions Tuesday at United Nations Plaza on how The City is coordinating public safety resources in response to an alarming rise in drug overdose deaths.

The agenda for Tuesday’s regular Board of Supervisors meeting calls for a “special off-site meeting,” beginning at 2 p.m., at United Nations (U.N.) Plaza on McAllister Street. After Breed addresses Supervisors, the meeting will be recessed and supervisors will reconvene in City Hall for their usual session…(more)

Angry SF Giants Fans Rail Against Beer Costs, Parking Fees, BART as Attendance Drops

By Ethan Kassel : sfstandard – excerpt

Expensive parking, smaller beer that’s hardly “cheaper” than the full-size options and seemingly unsafe public transit have all been cited as factors that have kept San Francisco Giants fans away from Oracle Park.

Fans on Reddit responded to an analysis The Standard recently did of this year’s slumping attendance, explaining their reasoning for staying home instead of going out to the ballpark—and they didn’t hold back.

“Cheaper beer? You mean smaller beer,” Reddit user LJSearles commented.

The 14-ounce domestic options, available at select Doggie Diner stands for $9 each, are cheaper than the full-size options on a per-ounce basis, but it’s far from a bargain, fans said. Other fans blamed a particularly wet spring for low attendance, while some said missing out signing big-name stars such as Aaron Judge hurt attendance numbers…

Parking Woes…

Sparse parking availability was also noted by numerous fans, with many lamenting having to pay $40 or more for a spot. However, much of the parking around the stadium is operated by third parties, as SF Giants Transportation Director Joshua Karlin-Resnick noted…(more)

Inside the SF building that could be a model for office-to-housing conversions

By Tessa McLean : sfexaminer – excerpt

Even on a rainy San Francisco day, light floods the nearly floor-to-ceiling windows lining the walls of the Warfield Building. Exposed brick borders the windows, giving the office space a decidedly hip feel, one that echoes the urban loft vibe that was once so trendy in major cities. Market Street bustles below, but the street noise is minimal, and from the high floors, the views stretch out to Bernal Hill and beyond.

These office conference rooms could someday be someone’s bedroom, if local developer Group I can get past the city’s Byzantine permitting process and execute an incredibly rare office-to-residential conversion project, which many have billed as one of the only reasonable solutions to the city’s perpetual housing crisis. As downtown San Francisco continues to struggle to revitalize itself post-pandemic, transforming office buildings into housing has been talked about as something of a golden ticket. Not only would it help to make a dent in the city’s woefully inadequate housing supply, but it could also rejuvenate a district that desperately needs a boost, especially as more businesses continue to close(more)

Affordable housing is critical infrastructure, and the city needs to invest now

By Shanti Singh and Roisin Isner : 48hils – excerpt

SF won’t begin to meet its housing goals unless Breed commits the funding.

In the coming weeks, Mayor London Breed will present a $14 billion budget proposal that will shape the direction of affordable housing in San Francisco for years to come. This budget will choose to either invest voter-approved funding to expand the supply of affordable housing, or to scatter and spend that funding for uses not intended by the voters.

In 2020, a clear majority of San Francisco’s voters approved Proposition I, which increased taxes on the transfer of real estate worth more than $10 million. The official ballot arguments in favor of the measure explicitly stated that the new revenue should be dedicated to expanding affordable housing. Since then, Proposition I has generated more than a quarter of a billion dollars in new revenue for the City of San Francisco, and the Board of Supervisors unanimously approved an ordinance to commit Proposition I revenue to affordable housing upon its passage.

Proposition I became a model for Los Angeles’ Measure ULA, which also increased taxes on large property sales and was approved by voters last year. Following its passage, Mayor Karen Bass immediately committed Measure ULA revenue towards an ambitious and innovative plan for housing preservation and production. Yet it remains unclear whether Breed will follow our sister city’s lead…(more)

Upstart: Mission Local has a new senior editor!

By Lydia Chavez : missionlocal – excerpt

Joe Rivano Barros

After many years in which I’ve run the newsroom in tandem with Joe Eskenazi — a feat that sometimes felt like a high-wire act — Mission Local has added a new senior editor. His name is Joe Rivano Barros, and he started in April. (I know, two Joes. We haven’t yet figured that one out.)

Joe Rivano joined Mission Local right out of Stanford University in 2014 as part of the Rebele Internship program, which places young students in local newsrooms. He was terrific then — bookish, curious and thoughtful. Unfortunately for us, he was also eager for foreign adventure and left the Bay Area to work for a nonprofit in Bhutan.

When he returned, we hired him as a full-time reporter and he did superb work on the homeless, housing and political issues. At the time, we had only three reporters, all of whom covered everything — a madhouse of a newsroom in what was probably half the size of a Pacific Heights closet…

Already, Joe E. and I can see the benefits of what he brings to the job — a deep knowledge of and love for the city as well as superior editing and organizational skills. All are essential as Mission Local grows…

So, welcome Joe and if you need to get in touch with him, he can be reached at joe.rivanobarros…(more)

Supes unanimously oppose closing Bayview RV site

by Joe Rivano Barros : missionlocal – excerpt

118 residents across 114 RVs would be dispersed if the site were closed

The Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted unanimously to oppose the planned closure of a Bayview RV site that has housed hundreds of homeless people over the last three years.

The site, located at Pier 94 and surrounded by industrial lots, is slated to be closed by the end of the year. The 118 residents currently living there would be transitioned into other forms of housing, according to the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing, which manages the site…

The vote on Tuesday simply urges the city to keep the site open. Both the city’s homeless department and the …(more)

64 software bugs, complex union rules and a $15.8 million mistake: Why S.F. can’t pay its teachers on time

By Bilal Mahmood : sfchronicle – excerpt

If our bureaucracy makes it difficult to accomplish something as seemingly simple as paying a teacher on time, how can we solve the rest of the challenges we face as a city?

Charles Sylvester has been a special-education teacher for over 20 years in San Francisco Unified School District. He’s seen plenty of ups and downs during that time, but in 2023 he encountered a career first.

The district misreported his taxes. Thousands of dollars of payments were effectively missing…

He isn’t alone. Over the past year, over 5,000 school district staff members have reported missing payroll, taxes misreported or delayed 403(b) payments…

In 2022, the school district transitioned from a 17-year-old payroll system to a new system dubbed EMPowerSF. Almost immediately, hundreds of employees reported payroll issues.

Over a year later, those issues still persist, despite the district spending over $30 million on the new system. That’s almost $10,000 per teacher…

To add insult to injury, the same software underlying the EMPowerSF system had been used once before in a California school district. In 2007, Los Angeles Unified School District also launched a payroll system powered by the same software, and it also failed to pay teachers on time

“SFUSD’s job is education, not writing code,” said Autumn Looijen, a software engineer and co-founder of the public school advocacy group SF Guardians, which investigated the district payroll debacle on behalf of her organization. “The problem is, the school board approved a contract that relied on Infosys to build a software system but left SFUSD on the hook for fixing software bugs.”

A $15.8 million mistake

So, what caused a critical service like a payroll system to fail so spectacularly?

Talking to current and former district officials involved with the software implementation, one persistent issue kept emerging — a lack of testing…

Bilal Mahmood is a civil servant and entrepreneur, and a board member at SF YIMBY(more)

Financing Plan for Firefighting Infrastructure Released

By Thomas K. Pendergast : richmondreview – excerpt

A study on financing the expansion of the Emergency Firefighting Water System (EFWS) – a separate heavy-duty pipeline system designed to fight a devastating conflagration following a major earthquake – was recently released by city agencies.

The report was in response to a resolution passed by the Board of Supervisors last September which called for the Office of Resilience and Capital Planning (ORCP) to come up with a financing plan by Dec. 31, 2022, to expand the EFWS.

The EFWS, formerly known as the Auxiliary Water Supply System, was initially built after the 1906 earthquake because so many water mains and connections in the regular system were broken that there was almost no water pressure left to fight fires. A fire break was created along Van Ness Avenue and a U.S. Navy firefighting ship pumping seawater from off shore was able to stop the fires from going further west…(more)

If you live in the western side of the city, you should read this article that describes what is needed and what may happen next.

SF School district approves $43k more for payroll system fix

By Allyson Aleksey : sfexaminer – excerpt
Teachers from more than 10 San Francisco public schools protest in front of SFUSD’s main office at 555 Franklin Street and blocked traffic on Franklin Street on Wednesday, Nov. 2, 2022…

More money is trickling into the San Francisco Unified School District’s faulty payroll system, albeit a drop of cash compared to the wave of millions spent so far.

On Tuesday, the San Francisco Board of Education voted to approve a contract amendment with SAP America, Inc., a software company that the district has worked with since 2018, to assist with its bungled payroll system EMPowerSF.

Since its rollout in January 2022, teachers have found their paychecks missing entire days of pay, retirement contributions deducted but not deposited in accounts, and more recently, errors in state tax filings

No public comment was received, and because the item was placed under the meeting’s consent calendar, there was no discussion between commissioners. As of press time, there is still no concrete date as to when the system will be fully fixed, leaving teachers in the lurch for the rest of the school year…(more)

RELATED:

The dire state of substitute teaching in San Francisco