By Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt


Tenants, neighborhood groups, and some supes are saying the plan will hurt renters and small businesses—and needs more environmental review
Opposition to Mayor Daniel Lurie’s plan to upzone much of the city is emerging on several fronts, from tenants, small businesses, and a neighborhood group that argues the sweeping plan never got a valid environmental review. There’s also a serious problem with providing transit service to the new residents.
Meanwhile, two supervisors are pushing legislation to address some of the displacement concerns, and Lurie has already said he will support one of those bills…
At Question Time today, Sup. Myrna Melgar told Lurie that a lot of people are worried about the displacement of small businesses and rent-controlled housing units.
Lurie said “we will not leave rent-controlled units and small businesses behind.” He insisted that “most new housing is built on vacant land,” which may be the case now—but there’s no way to build the tens of thousands of units his plan envisions without demolishing existing residential and commercial structures.
Melgar has introduced legislation that provides incentives to developers and landlords to protect housing and small business:..
Meanwhile, Sup. Chyanne Chen has introduced a broader bill. The Race and Equity in All Planning Coalition issued a statement saying that it will work with Chen to make sure the bill:
- Requires disclosure of plans to demolish and early noticing of rights to tenants;
- Prevents wrongful evictions and holds landlords accountable for bad behavior;
- Guarantees the maximum possible relocation assistance allowed under the law; and
- Enforces tenants’ rights to return to a comparable unit should their building be redeveloped…
RELATED:
The six fatal flaws in Mayor Lurie’s so-called ‘Family Zoning Plan’
Mayor will face opponents to zoning plan at rallies outside of City Hall
Engardio recall is a shot across the bow of every San Francisco elected official
