SF takes another step toward public power

By Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt

First report released on buying out PG&E. 

San Francisco is taking another big step on the path to create a municipal public power system, a plan that would reduce carbon emissions, bring in hundreds of millions a year in revenue—and fulfill a legal mandate that dates back to 1913.

The Planning Department just released its Draft Environmental Impact Report for the project, which will come before the commission for a public hearing April 17.

Much of the material in the DEIR is technical, and involves how the city would take over, rebuild, or connect to the Martin Substation on the border with Daly City. That’s the facility that turns high voltage power from the city’s own Hetch Hetchy generating facility and other sources into commercial and residential electricity.

The report suggests several options for that facility, and for the modest amount of trenching that might be needed to connect power lines.

But the real information is here … (read the details online)

The city has asked the state Public Utilities Commission to come up with a number for the value of PG&E’s assets. When that happens (and it keeps getting delayed, now we are hearing 2026), San Francisco can go to court, condemn the property under eminent domain, and buy it at the market price.

None of this will cost the taxpayers a penny, and will have no negative impact on the city budget. The SFPUC can issue revenue bonds, backed only by the projected income from retail electricity sales. There would be zero financial risk to the city; if the project doesn’t pencil out, Wall Street’s not going to buy the bonds anyway.

But the upside is huge, both in terms of clean energy and finances. PG&E has just asked the state PUC to allow it to raise rates, yet again—this time to offer more profit to the shareholders. The Budget Analyst and the Controller would have to run the numbers, but every time I’ve looked at this, the data shows the city would net more than $500 million a year—after paying the interest on the bonds, and paying to move PG&E workers into the city system in the same union at the same pay, and maintaining the lines and every other cost. And rates could be much lower.

Meanwhile, the city could move quickly to encourage solar panels on roofs and develop wind power and head toward a carbon-free grid (more)

As we have noted, the state of California through the SFPUC, is doing everything in its power to encourage big energy companies to raise the utility rates and discourage private solar power production. Please support all the efforts of https://solarrights.org to protect and expand independent solar production in California.

When you consider who to support for the next governor and state representatives, you might consider who is LEAST likely to continue the assault on independent producers and other renewable sources of energy at lower costs to consumers.

The Details of CPUC’s Disastrous Proposal for Updating Net Metering in California

votesolar  – excerpt

Californians: Take action now to protect rooftop solar!

The Background

On December 13, 2021, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) issued a proposed decision updating solar net metering. Their proposal would create major new barriers for Californians who want to invest in rooftop solar and battery storage. Net metering is a foundational clean energy policy that allows customers with onsite solar to save on their electric bill by receiving a credit for the excess clean energy they send back to the grid.

The popular policy has helped make California the national leader in rooftop solar adoption, with over 1.3 million solar roofs installed statewide. The December 13th proposal would reverse solar progress by decimating solar bill savings for future solar customers, as well as changing the rules on existing solar customers.

The proposed decision has been in the works for a while. The CPUC, which regulates the state’s investor-owned utilities, opened a proceeding to update net metering back in August 2020. Stakeholders including Vote Solar submitted and debated a range of proposed policy changes, which the Commission considered as it developed the 187-page proposal. Now over a year later, the CPUC released the proposal…

Some of the proposal’s most problematic elements include:(more)

California Utilities Will Buy More Energy, Hike Rates to Avoid Blackouts: CPUC

Utilities will be allowed to buy extra energy and pass on the costs to customers in order to avoid a repeat of rolling blackouts that kicked in last summer when demand outpaced supply, California regulators said Thursday.

The California Public Utilities Commission voted unanimously to authorize Pacific Gas and Electric, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric Company to purchase additional power in the next three months.

“Customers deserve a reliable grid, and they deserve a regulatory body that will be mobilized to do everything in its power to ensure that we have one,” commission President Marybel Batjer said…(more)

All the more reason for people to switch to solar power, but, will the CPUC make that more difficult? Find out what California does for and against solar power users how the utilities exert constant pressure on net metering. https://solarrights.org

RELATED:

Utility bosses: If you make us look bad, there’s gonna be trouble

 

She Noticed $200 Million Missing, Then She Was Fired

By Scott Morris, Bay City News Foundation : propublica – excerpt

Alice Stebbins was hired to fix the finances of California’s powerful utility regulator. She was fired after finding $200 million for the state’s deaf, blind and poor residents was missing…

Earlier this year, the governing board of one of California’s most powerful regulatory agencies unleashed troubling accusations against its top employee.

Commissioners with the California Public Utilities Commission, or CPUC, accused Executive Director Alice Stebbins of violating state personnel rules by hiring former colleagues without proper qualifications. They said the agency chief misled the public by asserting that as much as $200 million was missing from accounts intended to fund programs for the state’s blind, deaf and poor. At a hearing in August, Commission President Marybel Batjer said that Stebbins had discredited the CPUC.

“You took a series of actions over the course of several years that calls into question your integrity,” Batjer told Stebbins, who joined the agency in 2018. Those actions, she said, “cause us to have to consider whether you can continue to serve as the leader of this agency.”…(more)