Chargefinder map online

https://chargefinder.com/us/charging-station-san-francisco-ccsf-sfmta/dnmrgz

It appears that the majority of public EV chargers were all planned for the now empty downtown office buildings and hotels and for some reason there are a lot of them around North Beach and Fisherman’s Wharf.

Another mistaken assumption by our city planners that the office workers would drive EVs and the rest of us would not. What do you want to bet that the EV chargers are not cheap. Perhaps they would like to move them to less dense neighborhoods where car owners live and now work in larger numbers.

Explainer: How Ballot Measures Are Made in San Francisco

By Mike Ege : sfstandard – excerpt

It’s a rare election in San Francisco that doesn’t feature some form of measure on the ballot, and some of the policy questions they pose might have you asking how they wound up going to voters in the first place…

This year—with four elections scheduled—has been especially busy.

So far, San Francisco has voted on 11 ballot questions, including four recalls. Our final election of the year, on Nov. 8, will probably also feature a full slate of measures. To date, the Board of Supervisors is mulling 10 more charter amendments for the fall election. Meanwhile, more measures—including a plan to undo car closures in Golden Gate Park and the Great Highway—are in the works.

So, how do these questions come before the electorate?

Ballot measures can land on the ballot in multiple ways, from signature-gathering to the legislative process. Here’s a breakdown of the different kinds of ballot measures and how exactly they happen…(more)

Thanks to the author for taking this on. We need a refresher course every now and then since the laws on these procedures have been known to change.

Supes demand housing in Haight; Breed balks

By Adam Shanks : sfexaminer – excerpt

The struggle over homeless services in The Haight will continue.

A new law will require The City to locate 20 units of temporary housing for young adults facing homelessness in the neighborhood — but it seems unlikely to ever actually happen.

Mayor London Breed will decline to sign the law, to which the Board of Supervisors gave final approval this month, her office confirmed to The Examiner. Nevertheless, the law will still take effect. It passed with unanimous support from the Board of Supervisors, rendering Breed’s veto power meaningless. Still, her refusal to sign is a signal she does not support the bill…

The Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing reviewed Preston’s legislation in a May report and estimated that it would cost between $5.7 million to $9 million to purchase 20 new units of housing. The cost of actually operating a 20-bed shelter was estimated to be between $715,000 to $860,000 per year.

The City has $58.4 million left in its Our City, Our home fund earmarked for transition-age-youth housing, but spending it on shelter — including the transitional shelter stipulated in Preston’s legislation — is not allowed without a tweak to city law, according to HSH.

The City’s Real Estate Division looked in the neighborhood and did not find a single appropriate building for sale. Eleven were available for lease, but none of those were an entire building…(more)

Call Newsom: Don’t Tax the Sun

By Sue Vaughan : burningplanet – excerpt

Solar employees and advocates gather at the CPUC in San Francisco on June 2, 2022

Solar employees and advocates gather at the CPUC in San Francisco on June

ACTION ITEMS FOR TODAY

There are two major downsides to capitalism. One, in capitalism there are winners and there are losers. And two, the end product of capitalism is an unlivable planet.

One year ago, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez. D-San Diego, the David in the so-far failed battle against the Goliaths of Uber, Lyft, Instacart, Doordash, and other exploitative and polluting gig industries, got very confused about who the winners and losers in the energy industry are, and tried to take on a new “enemy” — the California rooftop solar industry..

So their marketing wizards came up with a campaign that argued that lower income Californians who could not afford rooftop solar were subsidizing the rooftop solar of those who could – and who got rebates for returning energy to the grid. Gonzalez sponsored AB 1139, a bill that would have decreased the amount that people with rooftop solar would be paid for the energy they pump into the grid and increased the amount they would have been charged for monthly grid maintenance.(See analysis of donations to state lawmakers at the end of this story.).

Rooftop solar providers, customers, environmentalists, and working class advocates got organized – and the measure didn’t make it out of the Assembly.

But the idea hasn’t gone away. It’s just been moved to the five, unelected members of the California Public Utilities Commission...

On Thursday, June 2, hundreds of rooftop solar installers, rooftop solar customers, environmentalists, and representatives of disadvantaged communities rallied at the CPUC buildings in San Francisco and Los Angeles to protest the newest proposals. The essence of their opposition? Reducing net metering rates (the rebates that go back to entities that pump electricity into the grid from rooftop solar) and raising grid maintenance rates would enrich these utilities at the expense of the planet. Crucially, these proposals would eliminate the financial incentives that homeowners now have to install rooftop solar. Opponents have called the proposals a tax on the sun. They also would have put about 2,000 solar companies out of business and eliminated around 70,000 jobs, according to the California Solar & Storage Association...(more)

Read the rest of the articles linked above for more details on the various players so you will know where to push the matter at the state level. Phil Ting supported AB1139. Call him to let him know where you stand and how likely you are to oppose his next run for office if he continues to support Big Energy companies efforts to kill solar.

In our case, we should also call and send letters to Senator Wiener and Assemblymembers Ting and Haney and any oher people in Sacramento you know. Phone calls to the CPUC directors are also encouraged. See some contact info here:  https://discoveryink.wordpress.com/ca-legislative-process

ACTION ITEMS FOR TODAY

 

 

 

SF Police Union President Steps Down Amid Claims of Financial Impropriety

an Francisco’s police union has turned against its president, pressuring him to resign as rumors of financial impropriety upended his attempt to return to his leadership role from extended medical leave.

Tony Montoya has stepped down as president of the San Francisco Police Officers Association, his successor Tracy McCray announced Wednesday in an internal email to officers obtained by The Standard.

Montoya’s departure represents a changing of the guard in a union that tried to rehabilitate its relationship with City Hall under his tenure. Montoya was by no means a champion of reform, but he struck a more conciliatory tone than his predecessors whose vocal criticism earned them a reputation for undermining change…(more)

 

DA Recall Likely to Slow Criminal Justice Reforms and Lead to Office Shakeup

Boudin Ousted by Coalition of Asian Voters From All Income Levels and Wealthy Whites

By Anna Tong : sfstandard – excerpt

A powerful bloc of voters led by Asians and affluent white residents drove support for Tuesday’s recall of District Attorney Chesa Boudin, according to election day results by voting precinct. The anti-recall campaign, by contrast, failed to make inroads beyond the city’s progressive strongholds.

The latest data available shows Proposition H, the ballot measure, passing by about 60-40 citywide. That’s a clear majority, but support was hardly uniform across SF. Neighborhoods where support for the recall exceeded 80% included precincts in the Marina, Visitacion Valley and around Lake Merced. Put together, it tells a story of a recall support coalition between affluent, whiter neighborhoods and Asians from across the economic spectrum.…(more)

The question to answer is “why are people in some districts not voting?” or is it the mail-in votes on the last day that cause the delay and create the illusion that people are not voting?

Community hub funding eliminated in new city budget

By Eleni Balakrishnan : missionlocal – excerpt

After two years of praise and acknowledgement for their strong pandemic response, community organizers are suddenly feeling like the mayor’s new budget has pulled the rug out from under them.

In the midst of a new surge, the mayor’s budget cuts all funding for Covid-19 response work provided by community hubs, which focus on providing testing and vaccines for neighborhoods and communities heavily impacted by the pandemic and in need of resources.

Community leaders who run the centers in neighborhoods like the Mission, Bayview-Hunters Point, and Lakeview-Outer Mission, were surprised in a Zoom call last week to hear that they would lose their funding at the end of the month…(more)

Unbelievable.

Mayor’s budget: Plenty for the cops, but no more money for social housing

By Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt

The plan is going to get a lot of pushback from the supes. So it’s far from a done deal

Mayor London Breed’s proposed budget for the next two years is a massive document, 386 pages of numbers, charts, graphics—and spin. It’s going to take all of us who follow these things a few days at least to sort it all out.

But some essential takeaways are clear.

The budget substantially increases funding for the Police Department, including a move to hire a lot more sworn officers, at a time when some of the supes are following national recommendations to shift work now done by cops in uniform, with guns, to civilian workers…(more)