PG&E discontent fuels increased pressure for public power

By Patrick Hoge : sfexaminer – excerpt (audio) 
 

Numerous San Francisco elected officials ratcheted up the pressure for a potential takeover of Pacific Gas & Electric’s transmission grid in The City this week, reflecting deep discontent with the utility after recent outages that at one point in December left 130,000 people without power.

“We are done, and it is time for San Francisco to break up with PG&E,” state Sen. Scott Wiener said Monday on the steps of City Hall, where he was flanked by Board of Supervisors President Rafael Mandelman and Supervisors Matt Dorsey, Bilal Mahmood and Danny Sauter.

Wiener, a longtime PG&E critic who in 2020 unsuccessfully pushed legislation to turn the company into a public utility, was there to unveil state Senate Bill 875, a measure aimed at making it easier for cities to seek separation from private utilities through the California Public Utilities Commission…

…San Francisco already provides more than 75% of the electricity consumed in The City through its not-for-profit CleanPowerSF program and its hydroelectric Hetch Hetchy Power System… (more)
How will San Francisco ownership changer the fate of the people who own or want to invest in rooftop solar systems? Will the city rollback the anti-solar legislation that was put in place by the CPUC and supported by the state legislature?

On Treasure Island, One Grocer and a Patchwork of Neighbors Keep People Fed

by Cami Dominguez : sfpublicpress – excerpt

View from a Treasure Island residence indicates the distance residents must travel to get to markets.

With no supermarket and limited transit, residents support each other with a community garden and food pantry

In 2003, Abdo Nasser and his family found themselves on Treasure Island on an uncharacteristically warm San Francisco day. There as tourists, Nasser and his family grew thirsty and searched for a grocery store. However, as they roamed, it became clear there were none.

My wife and I and the kids needed water — it was a hot day,” Nasser said in a recent interview. “There was no water, no snacks, nothing.”

Treasure Island has long been a neighborhood without a retail ecosystem because of its isolation from services available in the rest of San Francisco. While a massive redevelopment project is underway, it has not translated to basics like supermarkets.

Nasser saw an opportunity and approached the Treasure Island Development Authority board of directors. He was told that no long-term lease would be available, since big real estate development projects on the island were imminent. It wasn’t until 2008, Nasser said, that he was given a 600-square-foot “shack” by the lone road connecting the island to the mainland via the Bay Bridge.

Nasser quickly learned that residents wanted and needed more. He moved to a 3,000-square-foot location in 2012 before finally setting up Treasure Island Cove’s current location in 2016. More than two decades after Nasser first searched for a grocery store site, his remains the only one on the island…

Food pantry doubles clientele

But for many residents, off-island food shopping is too burdensome or expensive. One Treasure Island runs a weekly food bank in coordination with the San Francisco-Marin Food Bank. Established more than 20 years ago, the partnership provides access to fresh produce and non-perishables, with limited amounts of eggs, milk, bread and meat, every Tuesday…

Garden, meet farm

According to Treasure Island Development Authority’s president, V. Fei Tsen, an urban farm was always part of the original Treasure Island master plan.

The plan allocates 13 acres in the center of Treasure Island for farming. Originally the plan set aside 25 acres, but part of that was turned over for a training facility for Bay FC, as well as a potential site for a job training program, Allison Albericci, the development authority’s major sites principal planner, said at a November agency meeting...(more)

President’s Message – February 2026

by Deborah Murphy

I want to thank our panelists from our January zoom meeting for an interesting and informative discussion on AWSS.

Our February 17 zoom panel discussion will be on street trees. Mayor Lurie and Supervisor Wong have proposed legislative amendments that will harm San Francisco’s already small urban tree canopy. If this passes it allows developers to choose between planting trees and paying an (inadequate) in lieu fee which means fewer trees will get planted. It will eliminate the public’s right to appeal tree removal.

Our panelists so far are Josh Klipp, an accessibility consultant and Dave Osgood who is fighting to save trees in his neighborhood. I’ll update the website as more panelists are confirmed.

REGISTER FOR 2/17 STREET TREES DISCUSSION

CSFN holds monthly meetings to which all are welcome. Click the button below to see our full 2026 schedule.

CSFN 2026 MEETING SCHEDULE

If your organization hasn’t paid dues for 2026 yet you now have the option of paying by zelle using our email address – treasurer@csfn.net  or mail a check made out to CSFN to Greg Scott 637 Noe Street, SF CA 94114

We love to hear from you! Please email me at president@csfn.net or bridgelady@earthlink.net and let me know when and where your neighborhood organization is meeting. I want to keep attending as many meetings as possible and continue learning about the issues in our city neighborhoods.

Keep Crocker Real

 

By Keep Crocker Real released files this week. A lot is at stake. We need to hear your voices. Thursday, February 19, at 10:00am, City Hall, room 416. It’s item 9 on the agenda:

 

 

SYNTHETIC TURF PROGRAM – POLICY AND PROTOCOLS
You can documents on our website: keepcrockerreal.com/files

While you still can consider visiting Hummingbird Farm on February 22, from 11:00am to 2:00pm. where we will hang artwork from our If Nature Could Talk event on the 100+ trees Rec & Park intends to cut down. (We won’t damage the trees.) This is a great way to pay tribute to the historic trees and wildlife that will no longer be around if the “renovation” plan goes through unchanged.

If you want to learn more about the harms of plastic, author Judith Enck’s is giving a talk at the Commonwealth Club titled, The Problem with Plastic on Thursday, February 19 at 5:30pm.

This fight for a better neighborhood park isn’t over yet. We look forward to meeting and working with you soon. keepcrockerreal.com

Calmatters has a number of articles on various attempts made by state legislators to stop the installation of Astroturf. If any of these legislators are still in office, one might contact them to find out how you may help them bring the matter forward again.

Key  Legislative Actions and Trends

  • California SB 676 (2023): Signed into law, this allows cities and counties to restrict or ban the installation of artificial turf on residential properties. It effectively reverses a 2015 law that had prohibited local governments from doing so to encourage water-wise landscaping. This is why Rec and Park is holding hearings on the matter now.
  • California AB 1423 (2023): Proposed legislation that aims to ban the manufacturing and sale of artificial turf containing PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances).
  • Colorado SB24-081 (2024): Prohibits the installation of artificial turf containing intentionally added PFAS on state property starting January 1, 2026.
  • Local Bans: Certain municipalities, such as Boston, have implemented prohibitions on installing new artificial turf in city parks.

Environmental and Health Concerns Driving Legislation

  • Chemical Exposure: Studies have found PFAS, lead, and BPA in artificial turf materials, which can leach into the environment and be ingested or absorbed by users.
  • Microplastics: Turf breaks down into microplastics that wash into water sources.
  • Environmental Impact: Artificial turf creates “heat islands,” reduces biodiversity, and prevents soil aeration

California’s blockbuster legislation faces rocky rollout

By Sam Dillon : msn – excerpt

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/californias-blockbuster-housing-legislation-faces-rocky-rollout/ar-AA1W4Md0?ocid=socialshare

There is a bit of a disconnect between theory and results with the Wiener bills. Art by sfbluecomics.

Mass confusion over the meaning and implementation of SB79, which amounts to unlimited growth near mass transit, is sweeping California’s largest cities that are targeted by the one of the most draconian bills ever devised. After turning over the Pacific coastline to developers, and blaming cities for the housing shortage, Senator Wiener, has managed to make almost everyone mad at him. Now it turns out his penchant for writing long, detailed, prescriptive bills is not playing well with the public or city officials who are charged with enforcing what has been described as developer wet dreams.

In his haste to divide and conquer Wiener has succeeded in dividing both his friends and foes, often referred to as YIMBYS and NIMBYS. Wiener is not enjoying a lot of support from the press either. He relies heavily on the Abundant crowd in Silicon Valley, that his constituents are being hammered by. If you were not recently laid off by a high tech firm, you may have lost your income to Waymo or been evicted from a gentrified neighborhood.

Wiener is fighting a Dead horse that is obvious to everyone but him and people are ready to fight back.

There are some gems in this article that covers a lot of the history of how we got here and where the Wiener of the world want us to go. Here are a couple of pull-quotes from the article:

Teachers, others shocked to get SFUSD ‘assignments’ for strike day

By Joe Eskenazi : missionlocal – excerpt

On late Friday, workers were given ‘redeployment assignments’ to ‘Staff Centers’ opened because of Monday’s school closures. They’re confused.

On the cusp of Monday’s planned San Francisco teacher work stoppage, teachers were jolted to receive emails from the district telling them they had work to do.

On Friday evening, the San Francisco Unified School District emailed its 6,000-plus teachers, providing them information that they already knew — schools are closed Mondaydue to the overwhelming possibility of the first San Francisco teacher walkout in 47 years. The email informed teachers — who voted at a 97.6 percent clip to authorize Monday’s walkout — that they were receiving “redeployment assignments” to “Staff Centers” on Monday.

“In order to maintain District operations, we are opening Staff Centers where SFUSD employees should report to work,” the email states. “Staff are expected to work and report to their assigned Staff Center.” … (more)

S.F. housing is hottest topic in first debate between District 2 supervisor candidates

by IO YEH GILMAN : missionlocal – excerpt

In the first debate between the two candidates for San Francisco District 2 supervisor on Tuesday evening, housing was the most contentious topic.

Though candidates Stephen Sherrill and Lori Brooke also spent large parts of the debate talking about cars and public safety, their answers on housing drew the most audible response from the crowd of about 200 people gathered at Convent & Stuart Hall, who leaned older and whiter…

Brooke, a longtime neighborhood organizer, criticized the city’s recent upzoning plan, which allows taller, denser housing in the city’s north and west, including on commercial corridors like Lombard and Chestnut streets in District 2…

Neighborhoods United SF, which Brooke co-founded, is part of a coalition currently suing the city to block the upzoning plan.

Sherrill, who was appointed District 2 supervisor by outgoing Mayor London Breed in December 2024, voted for the plan. But at the debate, as he has previously, he distanced himself from it, pointing out that the upzoning was mandated by the state.

If he hadn’t voted for it, he said, the state would have taken over San Francisco’s ability to approve new housing, essentially allowing buildings of any height to be built anywhere…

Brooke pushed back on Sherrill, saying that state takeover wasn’t the “real issue.” That, she said, is YIMBY state laws — the ones that required upzoning and allowed a 25-story buildingto be proposed on the current site of the Marina Safeway right by the waterfront.

This did not let Sherrill off the hook. “My opponent says he doesn’t like [the Marina Safeway development], which is good, but he is endorsed by the very senator and the YIMBY organizations that wrote and championed the laws that made it possible,” Brooke said.

Unlike Sherrill, she said, she would push back strongly against Sacramento.

Sherrill, for his part, said, “I absolutely urge our state representatives to reform some of these laws.”…

Other questions focused on street safety and drugs.

Both Sherrill and Brooke said they think drug dealers with prior convictions should serve mandatory jail time. (“Thank you,” said Moriarty.) Both also agreed that fully staffing the police department was a high priority…

Another big topic: Transportation. Both candidates agreed that Market Street should be reopened to cars (a few people booed, then some cheered). They also both agreed that new housing developments should include more parking.

The city should not prioritize any “single mode” of transportation and should give “appropriate” weight to other forms of transportation, Brooke said, pointing to frustrations over traffic and parking. The city’s “transportation decisions,” she said, have become “less about neighborhood actual function and more about transit ideology.”… (more)

I love the way the media keeps harping on some districts for building less new housing than other districts. There is a good reason for this. Some districts are already built out, and some districts have a large amount of open space or old industrial uses that can easily to converted into new neighborhoods. There is also a different in seismic stress that we saw during the Loma Prieta earthquake. The Marina had heavy damage. Is this the place to build a 25 story housing project?


New Bombshell story from NY Post:   Ex-San Francisco mayor appointed Bloomberg pal to key seat in hopes of landing a job. People ask, is that legal or is that a bribe? Could this effect the election?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supes approve affordable senior housing project—but discussion raises larger issue

By Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt

Nonprofit housers are good neighbors. Speculators are not. But Wiener’s law treats both the same way.

To the surprise of nobody, the Board of Supes Tuesday rejected an attempt to delay or undermine an affordable housing project for seniors at the foot of Bernal Hill. The vote was unanimous.

A few neighbors on Coleridge street complained that the project would reduce the size of an existing park that has been closed for years and was hardly ever used when it was open. It’s a private park, not a city park, and it sits on top of a pedestal with a garage underneath, which makes it unstable anyway.

The project would include a new park that would be much more accessible…

Sup. Jackie Fielder, who supported the affordable senior housing, asked Planning Department staffer Audrey Maloney a pretty basic question. Under current state law, where are people supposed to go to raise questions about a new development in their neighborhood?

Maloney: Under SB 35 (a bill by state Sen. Scott Wiener), the city has no role in this project. The public has no right to a hearing. If it’s compliant with the local zoning, there’s nowhere to raise any questions. It’s approved by right…(more)

I’m going to add one other issue that comes to mind where handing out entitlements to developers is concerned. Not all of the projects are being built as planned. Quite a few change hands and the plans may be altered without any notice.  That is of great concern to the neighbors, and everyone concerned. Thousands of units are on hold. We have no idea what the developers will finally do once they decide to build, if they ever do.

As we all know, and Tim Redmond points out, “But SB 35, and its unholy progeny SB 423, doesn’t just apply to affordable housing projects. It also applies to a huge number of potential market-rate projects in much of San Francisco.” 

We don’t need for the state to declare we are under builder’s remedy because we failed to meet the RHNA goals. We already are.

 

Alex Shepard is the new San Francisco Inspector General

Information via email from SF Standard — G.G.

Anonymous whistleblowers wanted

Alex Shepard, is a former assistant U.S. attorney who has a history of busting major corruption cases, started this month as the city’s inspector general, where she’ll investigate fraud, waste, and abuse in the $16 billion budget. She is well known investigating big corruption cases in San Francisco. She establishing a new whistleblower portal and invites the people to report problems they see anonymously.

Shepard’s new role was created through passage of Prop C in 2024.

Power Play asked about the powers she wields and how she intends to use them. “There’s subpoena power available to the controller’s office, but Prop. C extended it to include not just people in the city [and] records but anyone who has a contract with the city or a grant agreement. And I have search-warrant power, which, as a former prosecutor, I’m really familiar with. I view the IG as kind of a force multiplier. I don’t have a lane. I can really look at anything.”

There are two kinds of cases she wants to pursue:
1. She wants to take up big cases which may have an outsize deterrent value, such as the Mohammed Nuru case,
2. She also wants to look into waste in government spending.

Alex Shepard’s message to potential whistleblowers is that they can now report to an anonymous portal without fear of retribution.
If you see something wrong, you should report it to the whistleblower portal. Alex is aware that people see things and are pressured into joining in on activities they know are wrong to keep their jobs. They should no longer feel threatened because now they can report anonymously on what they observe that they feel need to be investigated. Sunshine requests may be helpful to get the ball rolling as well.

President’s Message January 2026

by Deborah Murphy

A new year is upon us and CSFN will continue offering monthly panel discussions on important issues in San Francisco.

On Tuesday, January 20 at 6:30 pm PST we are hosting a Zoom panel discussion on AWSS – the auxiliary emergency firefighting water supply system, which desperately needs expansion to more neighborhoods. Our panelists will be SFFD Chief Dean Crispen, Assistant Deputy Chief Garreth Miller, John Crabtree, and Lisa Arjes. Pre-registration required!

 

CSFN holds monthly meetings to which all are welcome. Click the button below to see our full 2026 schedule.

 

We love to hear from you! Please email me at president@csfn.net or bridgelady@earthlink.net and let me know when and where your neighborhood organization is meeting. I want to keep attending as many meetings as possible and continue learning about the issues in our city neighborhoods.