Category: News

Posted on

S.F. could make it easier for small businesses to bid on city contracts

By Aldo Toledo : sfchronicle – excerpt (audio)
 

San Francisco officials want to streamline the city’s notoriously byzantine contracting process to make it faster and more efficient and open the doors to more small businesses currently shut out of bidding for work.

Businesses that want city contracting work have to sign a 31-page list of terms and conditions, many of which are duplicative of state law, irrelevant or downright confusing. While large corporations can devote time and resources to the city’s process, small businesses often can’t…

But Board of Supervisors President Rafael Mandelman wants to change that by updating the process for small businesses entering into contracts under $230,000 by standardizing or repealing a slew of esoteric rules in the city code.

Dubbed the Open For Business Contract Streamlining Act, Mandelman’s legislation is based on City Administrator recommendations from last year, which seek to end the “high level of administrative burden for both City staff and suppliers…

For Paul Pendergast, president of Build It, the largest industry association of LGBTQ and allied construction, architecture and engineering firms,  the changes could entice more bidders who may have been turned off by the city’s onerous rules.

“Anything the city can do to get more businesses to bid on contracts we are in favor of,” he said… (more)

Posted on

Can one man help wipe out S.F.’s drug markets? City officials want to find out

By Maggie Angst : sfchronicle – excerpt
 

David Kennedy has devoted his life to developing new approaches to curb gun violence and dismantle open drug markets.

In Boston, interventions adopted under Kennedy’s direction led to a 63% decline in youth homicides. And in High Point, N.C., the city almost entirely eliminated open drug use and dealing over three years and saw a steep decline in violent crime, according to studies.

So could Kennedy — a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice and founder of the National Network for Safe Communities — help San Francisco eradicate its relentless open-air drug markets?

Some city officials want to find out. …

Supervisor Bilal Mahmood, with the support of Board President Rafael Mandelman and Supervisor Matt Dorsey, will make a formal request to Mayor Daniel Lurie and the board on Tuesday to hire Kennedy as an independent contractor to analyze San Francisco’s open-air drug markets and create an intervention plan tailored to the city. …

Dorsey also plans to introduce legislation Tuesday to codify that the city’s “primary objective” of its drug policies is to stop illicit drug use and help people attain long-term recovery from addiction. The legislation, in part, is meant to address concerns from some residents and city leaders that it is too focused on harm reduction and not enough on treatment. Dorsey made a request in late 2022 to bring in Kennedy, and the professor developed a proposal to address the city’s illicit drug markets, but the deal was never finalized. The estimated cost of the two-year initiative at that time was about $550,000, according to city records…

Kennedy’s strategy — referred to as “Drug Market Intervention” — calls for disrupting the supply of drugs into the market and creating a maintenance plan to ensure the market stays closed. His team saw success in cities like High Point, N.C. and Nashville during the crack epidemic, but he told the Chronicle that addressing San Francisco’s current markets, which are dominated by the sale of the cheap, highly addictive synthetic opioid fentanyl, will likely require its own unique approach.

“I’m not presuming that any of the particular tactics that worked for the crack era markets will work here,” Kennedy said in an interview. “But I wouldn’t be agreeing to work with the city if I didn’t think that there was real promise here.”…

To guide Kennedy’s work, Mahmood is proposing to expand the city’s Drug Market Agency Coordination Center, a public safety interagency task force started under Breed, to a 24/7 operation to arrest more overnight drug dealers. He also wants to see the city add more street ambassadors to deter drug markets from popping up in new areas and increase support for workforce and youth development programs to prevent young people from getting pulled into the drug trade. … (more)

RELATED:

In SF’s Move to Give Mayor Daniel Lurie Extra ‘Fentanyl’ Powers, This One Phrase Stood Out, “‘The will of the voters.’ Crime is down, drug deaths are lower, but a so-called emergency measure continues a rollback of permissive policies.”

It was be good see a critique of Kennedy’s work. How successful has his strategy been?

Posted on

Cal Fire’s new fire risk maps mean big changes for California homeowners

By Julie Johnson and Harsha Devulapalli : sfchronicle – energy (interactive map)

Cal Fire on Monday published updated fire maps for 125 cities from the Bay Area north to the Oregon border.

California fire officials released long-awaited maps on Monday showing fire risk in cities across the Bay Area and along the northern coast of California.

The maps, which are still in draft form, will have major implications: They will guide where stricter fire-resistant building and landscape rules apply, and are an update to fire risk maps issued more than a decade ago. For example, the state’s pending ban of plants and other combustible materials within five feet of homes will apply to properties categorized on the new maps (i.e., in local responsibility areas) as having “very high fire severity hazard.” That includes parts of Bay Area cities like Berkeley, Oakland, Tiburon, Mill Valley, Santa Rosa, San Bruno, San Jose and Palo Alto…

The maps are not expected to change how insurance companies weigh fire risk and make policy decisions, according to the California Department of Insurance. The department published a Q&A about the maps that said insurance companies are required to provide “discounts for wildfire safety actions such as community mitigation and home-hardening, which Cal Fire’s maps do not assess.”

“Insurance companies are already using risk analysis tools and models that go beyond Cal Fire’s proposed maps in determining what properties they will underwrite,” the department said….

The maps do not take account of homeowners’ mitigation efforts.

Last year, Cal Fire published new fire hazard maps for the areas of the state it protects, which includes most but not all of non-incorporated California, dubbed “state responsibility areas.” All homes in these areas must adhere to the state’s strictest fire-safe standards for buildings and landscapes, including the state’s upcoming “zone zero” landscape rules that will require homeowners to keep five feet around their homes clear of most plants and other flammable materials like bark mulch.

Cal Fire developed the new draft maps using scientific models that evaluated factors like terrain and vegetation. These new models found the risk of fire had grown in cities and towns, and expanded by 1.4 million acres the California areas designated as either “high” or “very high” fire hazard… (more)

Posted on

SF says celebrity chef walked away from two Union Square cafes

By Patrcik Hoge : sfexaminer – excerpt (audio)

Celebrity chef Tyler Florence stepped away from a role operating two cafes in Union Square last week right before the start of the NBA All-Star weekend, according to San Francisco officials who nevertheless said the downtown shopping district put on a good show for tourists in town for the basketball event and associated attractions.

As a result of Florence’s departure, city officials hastily recruited a celebrated local baker who provided pastries over the weekend and on Tuesday at one of the two kiosks leased by The City to Florence, though the woman said she did not know what would happen going forward.

Florence’s company was granted a three-year lease for The City’s properties in 2023. Efforts to get comment from Florence or someone at his company were unsuccessful…

As with the recent NBA All-Star Game, Breed and others at the time were eager for The City to put a favorable foot forward for another high-profile gathering, the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, as well as for the winter holidays.

To that end, The City’s Office of Economic and Workforce Development gave Florence a grant of $440,000 to get the eateries up and running. The award rankled some who said the money had been earmarked for revitalizing lower Powell Street.

City supervisors last year subsequently voted to accept $2 million more in state grant money for upgrading the restaurant kiosks that Florence took over… (more)

Ever wonder where those millions are coming from and where they are going? Here are some hints for those who care to follow up on them.
Posted on

Airbnb founder now working with Musk; here’s who was on his side in SF when it mattered

By Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt

You know you are repeating past mistakes when past warnings confirm the threats of the past were real.  This video was shot at one of the first Airbnb demonstrations held in SF about a decade ago. All the warnings were ignored. And now here we are being overtaken by the cute little struggling tech startups we warned against. And who was around to campion them?

Breed, Chiu, and Wiener helped make Joe Gebbia a billionaire; now he’s helping destroy democracy in the US.
 

Now that Joe Gebbia, the billionaire co-founder of Airbnb, is joining Elon Musk’s attempt to dismantle the federal government, I would like to remind everyone of a little history.

Airbnb was started in San Francisco, and for its first few years, every single listing in this city was illegal. The company’s entire business model was illegal. It was also deeply damaging to tenants, many of whom lost their homes so the place could be turned into a hotel room…

Ed Lee was the mayor. He did nothing, nothing, to enforce the city laws against short-term rentals. Airbnb was a tech company; the mayor loved tech companies. His administration also did nothing to stop Uber and Lyft, which were violating city law every single day.

In those days, if you were a tech startup, you didn’t have to worry about local laws. Move fast, break things; it’s easier to ask forgiveness than permission. Never mind if you are ruing the lives of low-income renters and struggling cab drivers; they don’t count… (more)

Not much has changed except the coddled cute little techies that needed room to grow have outgrown SF and jumped from local to state to national destruction. When is enough enuf? Share this one if you can.

Posted on

San Francisco’s Right-Wing Tech Bros Go National

By Lincoln Mitchell : excerpt

Many of the acsendant crypto-goniffs in Washington have roots in San Francisco.

As recently as a few years ago many would have indentified San Francisco as the capital of liberal, or at least Democratic, America. The Vice-President was from the Bay Area and had gotten her start in elected office in San Francisco. One former mayor of San Francisco was the governor of California and an emerging national leader of the Democratic Party. Another former mayor was an aging, but groundbreaking, US Senator. The Speaker of the House and longtime leader of her party in that chamber was San Francisco’s congresswoman. This was still a time when people would, inaccurately, say things like a conservative in San Francisco was a radical in the rest of America.

Over the last few years, something began to change. In San Francisco, right-wing politics reemerged, initially in the form of self-styled feel-good civic groups sneaking conservative messaging into other fora-come for the garbage clean-up and the opportunity to mingle with other young singles, and stay for the right-wing spin about San Francisco…(more)

First thing they said was, “Parking isn’t a right it is a privilege.” Second thing they said was, “Disruption is good before it forces change.” After that the systems all fell apart. If the author is right, the country  will soon look like San Francisco. We were the Petri dish.

 

Posted on

NEWSOM JUST QUIETLY FLOATED AN IDEA THAT COULD HELP FIX CALIFORNIA’S HOUSING AND FIRE RECOVERY CRISES

By Ben Metcalf : sfchronicle – excerpt (audio track)

Rebuilding after the Los Angeles fires is going to be time-consuming and expensive. Accordingly, much attention has been given to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s recent executive actions to speed up the process and cut red tape, including by waiving environmental reviews, sidestepping Coastal Commission oversight and providing additional state resources to city and county planning and building officials

However, a different and little-noticed idea from the governor, included as part of his budget proposal to the Legislature early in January, also has the potential to be impactful. A small paragraph teases a big vision for housing: a new California housing and homelessness agency.

This proposed agency — which would replace the Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency that oversees a kitchen sink of other state functions (such as horse racing and cannabis regulation) — promises instead a “more integrated and effective” administrative framework for addressing the state’s housing and homelessness challenges. It would oversee all of the existing housing entities and be tasked with leading the state’s response on aligning housing policies with transportation, climate and community planning… (more)

We need to look into the process for creating and dissolving state agencies because that is what Newsom is suggesting. What happens to the staff? We might want to talk to them.

What is the connection between an agency that oversees Business, Consumer Services and Housing and one that oversees Housing and Homelessness issues. Are they eliminating state oversight of Business and Consumer Services, combing them with other agency, or setting up a new oversight agency?

The new agency just adds climate and community planning to housing and transportation. How does combining “housing policies with transportation, climate and community planning” solve homelessness? Is this a ploy to circumvent CEQA more than they already have?

This makes no sense unless it is a power play. Once again the state wants to force change on us and is eliminating some basic services and oversight we need in the process.

Once again our state representatives are trying to control us while eliminating the basic services and oversight we need.

Posted on

Homeless families sent eviction notices from S.F. shelters

by XUEER LU : missionlocal – excerpt

Karina Ortiz, a 26-year-old living in the Salvation Army Harbor House homeless shelter with her husband and seven-year-old daughter, will be evicted in March — the same month that she is due to give birth to a baby boy.

On the morning of Jan. 21, Ortiz stood in Room 200 of City Hall, joined by a half dozen other families also facing eviction. The group handed a staffer a letter demanding a meeting to address their urgent needs and asking the mayor to rescind the evictions.

These families all received an eviction letter with the operative date of Feb. 8 or 10 — about three weeks away. Ortiz managed to get a one-month reprieve.

The eviction notices came as a result of a change in policy from the San Francisco Department of Homeless and Supportive Housing in December. Under the new policy, homeless families are now only permitted to stay in city shelters for 90 days; previously, they could stay indefinitely. For families unable to get housing subsidies, this will put them back onto the street…

San Francisco has 405 families — 1,103 people — experiencing homelessness, according to the city’s point-in-time count report in 2024. However, the count is not accurate and tends to be an undercount…

“I’m very worried because we don’t have any place to go,” said Maria Zavala, a 37-year-old mother of three children in tears. Zavala’s family is living off of her husband’s biweekly garbage collector salary of $1,300. The family of five is cramped in a room with two sets of bunk beds. She said she can’t work because she needs to take care of her disabled six-year-old daughter full-time. … (more)

If San Francisco Department of Homeless and Supportive Housing can’t take care of 405 families by resending a decision to evict them, it is hard to believe that department will do much for the thousands of homeless who are living on the street. This seems like something our new mayor could fix in a flash by resend that decision.

Posted on

Lurie Rolls Out Fentanyl State of Emergency Ordinance, But Supervisors’ Dissent Already Brewing

By Joe KuKura : sfist – excerpt

New SF Mayor Daniel Lurie introduced his “Fentanyl State of Emergency Ordinance” on Tuesday, but there’s already some pushback, as it hands out no-oversight money to department heads to create potential for Mohammed Nuru-type self-dealing.

When San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie was inaugurated last Wednesday, Heather Knight’s New York Times dispatch had a scoop. “His declaration of a fentanyl emergency,” Knight wrote, “will speed its way to the Board of Supervisors, akin to a City Council, on Tuesday for what is expected to be swift approval.”

But that’s not exactly what happened. The legislation was not ready for a Board of Supervisors vote Tuesday (there may have been pushback from the City Attorney on some if its specifics, we’ll probably never know). It was merely “introduced” on Tuesday with no vote. And the Board’s response indicates this “swift approval” may not be as swift as hoped…

But Lurie’s ordinance already has opponents on the board.

“I guess we’re doing something kind of new at Roll Call today and expressing our support for initiatives — or in my case lack of support,” Supervisor Shamann Walton said. “During COVID, we gave emergency powers to the mayor with the presence of a specific plan. Right now we have legislation that requests waiving processes and allowing for swift decision-making, but we don’t have a plan in front of us.”…

Mission Local has been stressing for a couple months that, legally speaking, this is not an actual “Fentanyl State of Emergency.” They point to the language defining SF state of emergency orders, which notes that “The situation must be something that the City could not have specifically anticipated and prevented, such as an earthquake or a terrorist attack.” We’ve known fentanyl has been here for years, which is why London Breed’s 2021 attempt to declare a fentanyl state of emergency was renamed as a “Tenderloin state of emergency.”… (more)