Download notes on the meeting: 6-14 updates.
Huge Victory for SF Public Bank!
via email:
SF Board of Supervisors Passes Reinvest in San Francisco
Supes Vote 10-0 for a SF Public Bank!
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors took a giant step for public banking June 15 by voting 10-0, a veto-proof majority, to pass the Reinvest in San Francisco Ordinance, legislation introduced by Supervisor Dean Preston to rebuild the COVID-devastated economy with a public bank.
Reinvest In San Francisco builds on years of work by the San Francisco Public Bank Coalition, former Supervisors John Avalos, Malia Cohen and Sandra Lee Fewer, and many others who see the need for a municipal bank to counter the concentrated power of Wall Street banks. This legislation will result in San Francisco redirecting a portion of the city funds from “too big to fail” banks into the hands of community banks, credit unions and Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) that invest to benefit SF communities.
The Process for Starting the Public Bank
Reinvest in SF sets up a Working Group which will develop the plan for establishing our bank. Last year, an extensive report by the Budget and Legislative Analyst on a Municipal Bank for San Francisco recommended a phased-in transformation of City banking by beginning with a non-depository municipal financial corporation (MFC). Lending by the MFC will finance loans for small businesses, affordable housing and sustainable infrastructure enabling a smooth transition into a public bank. The Working Group will produce a business plan for the Board of Supervisors that will be sent to State regulators for approval.
Once chartered, under the rules of The Public Bank Act (AB857) signed into law last year, SF will have its own municipal public bank. As a depository bank, it will be able to leverage its capital multiple times in loans, greatly expanding its lending capabilities.
Parking lots kill. They also just saved lives.
Opinion by Joe Matthews : bakersfield – excerpt (also ran in SF Chronicle)
Friends, Californians, fellow drivers, stop honking your horns and lend me your ears…
California officials — all honorable — tell us that parking consumes huge amounts of property that might be used more productively for business, housing, or transit. Abundant parking encourages people to drive more. And more driving means more accidents, more injuries and deaths, and more pollution and greenhouse gases…
I know… anti-parking policies are well-intentioned. And yet, I stare into the bleak future of the California parking lot, and feel a strange sadness. Parking lots have been, for all their faults, good and true friends to our communities too…
And have not parking lots provided utility, even life-saving service under COVID? Think how many more people might have died if our state didn’t have so many large parking lots — from Petco Park-adjacent lots in San Diego to the Cal Expo and State Fair lots in Sacramento — to turn into mass testing and vaccination sites. Hospitals used their lots to set up tents for patients during COVID surges. Communities turned parking lots into tent cities to shelter the homeless safely, and temporarily, with the virus spreading…
You could even say parking lots saved democratic politics, as election rallies became drive-ins. Might our fair state still be slurred daily by President Trump, without the dedicated service of so many parking lots to Joe Biden’s campaign?…(more)
The sentiments echo mine when I heard about the plans to build on top of the visitors’ parking lot at General Hospital. My first concern was where are they going to set up emergency triage tents when they need them. This was years ago, before they did. I suppose the next step is to close down streets to set up tent or set them up in parks. There is a real need for open space around the hospitals and there is a need for parking and vehicle access during a major catastrophe.
When you read emergency evacuation plans, the first order of business is to pack your personal vehicle with all the essentials you can, and save room for people and pets. The larger the vehicle is, the higher off the ground, and the more metal it contains, and the stronger the engine is, the better your chances are of making it out under dire circumstances. A 4-wheel drive truck is not a luxury vehicle during an evacuation.
Supes to vote on public bank plan
By Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt
The Government Audit and Oversight Committee passed unanimously a plan that could lead to a public bank in San Francisco, and the item will come before the full board Tuesday/15.
The concept has been years in the making, and the bill by Sup. Dean Preston would set up a committee of experts with the task of drafting plans for a municipal bank within one year…
There are lots of options on how the bank could operate and what it could do. That would be worked out by the panel. The bank could, according to the supes Budget and Legislative Analyst,…
Both models feasible and could operate profitability. We recommend that the City establish a non-depository MFC, at least initially, for lower operating costs, bigger impact, and no requirement for FDIC approval…(more)
This is great news. I did not know about that option.
Senior Building Inspector Under Investigation in San Francisco
CDFW Takes Proactive Measures to Increase Salmon Smolt Survival
cdfgnews – excerpt
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) is taking the proactive measure of trucking millions of hatchery-raised juvenile Central Valley fall-run chinook salmon this spring to San Pablo Bay, San Francisco Bay and seaside net pens due to projected poor river conditions in the Central Valley. The massive trucking operation is designed to ensure the highest level of survival for the young salmon on their hazardous journey to the Pacific Ocean…(more)
Zoning changes could put a hurt on Black homeownership
By Badly Barber : wired – excerpt
I am a Black grandparent, homeowner and member of the Altadena Town Council. I grew up in a single-family home, and my husband and I have lived in our house in Altadena for more than two decades. Homeownership helped my family build wealth and provide stable, quality housing, and gave us our piece of the American Dream. But state and local politicians are threatening homeownership among the Black community by damaging single-family zoning laws…
Our homes have been sanctuaries that people know they can always return to, and we plan to pass our homes to our children so they can build wealth. We also are very engaged in our community because we have a vested interest as homeowners. Our homes, in a real way, give us political power and a voice at the table.
Plans for a public bank could take a big step forward this week
The Board of Supes is poised to take the next step toward creating a public bank in San Francisco.
The Government Audit and Oversight Committee will consider Thursday/3 a measure that would set up a committee with a mandate to develop a working municipal banking plan within one year…(more)
and… via email form SF Public Bank…
SFPBC Gearing Up for SF Reinvestment Hearing June 3rd!
Continue reading “Plans for a public bank could take a big step forward this week”
Two Legislators Take Aim at Statewide Planning Laws
In an apparent backlash against recent housing bills, two California state legislators have introduced a constitutional amendment that would essentially revoke the state’s ability to regulate land use. If approved, this amendment would allow cities to avoid compliance with state laws aimed at increasing housing production, making it more difficult to meet the housing needs of the growing California population.
The measure was introduced by Assemblymember Muratsuchi (D-Torrance) on March 16, 2021 and co-authored by Senator Glazer (D-Contra Costa). This comes after an attempt to get a similar citizen-initiated measure on the ballot, which has not reported any required signatures to the state as of this writing. In order to qualify for the ballot, two-thirds of each legislative chamber will need to approve the constitutional amendment. That amounts to a minimum of 54 votes in the Assembly and 27 in the Senate, assuming no vacancies. The governor’s approval is not required.
The constitutional amendment itself is fairly simple. It states that city or county regulations regarding “zoning or the use of land” prevail over conflicting state laws. Limited exceptions include conflicts with state statutes involving (1) the California Coastal Act, (2) the siting of certain power generating facilities, and (3) water or transportation infrastructure projects. Transportation infrastructure projects do not include transit-oriented development projects. This amendment would apply to both charter cities and general law cities. However, in charter cities, courts would determine whether a local ordinance that conflicts with one of the subject areas listed above addresses a matter of statewide concern or a municipal affair…(more)
Washington’s caution – a reminder as housing mandates descend
By Raymond Lorber : via email: (pulblished on Marinij)

George Washington was born on Feb. 22, 1732, 289 years ago. Each year, as we celebrate his birthday, we reflect upon Washington’s wisdom and character.
On Washington’s birthday, a review of his farewell address (1796) reminds us to be cautious of the thinking of our current government leaders. He warned us that, “It is important … that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution in those entrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon another.”
With the recent happenings at the Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., we have seen firsthand why Washington expressed this concern. We saw the power of the executive branch encroach upon the power of the legislative branch. This could have been prevented if only we had taken Washington’s advice and exercised “caution in those we entrusted with the administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres.”
Washington’s words of caution also ring loud and clear in our local government. State legislators are submitting housing bills that will enable the state to control housing decisions. They propose to override the local control currently administered by our cities and counties with the intention of replacing our single-family homes with high density housing.
In the 2021-2022 legislative session, senators have submitted bills SB 7, SB 8, SB 9 and SB10. Every one of these bills have clauses that override local control. State legislators are encroaching on the city’s rights with a goal to control and dictate neighborhood zoning from Sacramento.
SB 7, coauthored by senators Lena Gonzalez and Susan Rubio, nullifies local control. It states, “because the bill would require the lead agency to prepare concurrently the record of proceedings for projects that are certified by the Governor, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.”
SB 8, authored by Sen. Anna Caballero, promotes an override of local jurisdiction when a density bonus applies. It states, “when an applicant seeks a density bonus for a housing development within, or for the donation of land for housing within, the jurisdiction of a city, county, or city and county, that local government shall comply with this section.”
SB 9, coauthored by senators Mike McGuire and Gonzalez, as well as Assembly member Robert Rivas, overrides local control. It states, “the bill would set forth what a local agency can and cannot require in approving the construction of two residential units.”
SB 10, coauthored by senators Toni Atkins and Caballero, as well as Rivas, limits local control for proposed 10-unit housing. It states, “notwithstanding any local restrictions on adopting zoning ordinances enacted by the jurisdiction, including restrictions enacted by a local voter initiative, that limit the legislative body’s ability to adopt zoning ordinances, a local government may pass an ordinance to zone a parcel for up to 10 units of residential density per parcel, at a height specified by the local government in the ordinance.”
Are 10-unit complexes, on a single-family lot, appropriate for downtown Sausalito or for Mill Valley? (analysis of the latest amended version, may indicate up to 14 per site may be allowed.)
Furthermore, our governor is promoting a bill that would place state employees as monitors in the meetings of our supervisors, our city council members and our planning committees. The objective of these monitors is to “hold local governments accountable to increase housing production.”
In addition to the state encroachment, the regional authorities are infringing upon the local governments. The Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for the next cycle disregards the water supply or the sewage resources needed to support 2,785 additional units in San Rafael or the 1,018 units in Larkspur. The RHNA numbers do not take into consideration each particular city’s resources for supporting the additional housing.
“One size fits all” state and regional mandates are drastic encroachment measures that take away local control from our cities, counties and planning commissions. This overstepping is what Washington cautioned in his farewell address. Our current government leaders need to consider the wisdom and character of Washington.
Raymond G. Lorber, of San Rafael, is the author of “George Washington’s Providence.”
